The Plight of the Elpida
I am beginning to feel a bit like Michael Gray, who has, against the
odds, continued the champion the cause of the professional seafarer while
at the same time maintaining his position as a distinguished marine
commentator. After some time as editor of Lloyds List he now writes an
occasional column for that paper and was previously Editor of Fairplay
where he was good enough to publish my first efforts as a marine
journalist back in 1986. The point here is that the marine establishment
does not like to receive bad news, and people who report on the plight of
seafarers are inevitably offering very bad news. The message is almost
always that more money should be spent by owners, charterers and shippers
to ensure that the vessels carrying their cargoes are well found , well
manned and well managed.
Of course the advantage I have is that
no-one is paying me for what I write here, and no-one is likely to depose
me from my position as Editor of the Marex Offshore Review, but even so
one can only do a limited amount of campaigning on behalf of the mariner
otherwise our readership would become distressed and stop reading
altogether. We are also a magazine dealing with the offshore industry and
so what is written here should in some way reflect that fact.
Having said all this I would ask our
readers to reflect on the fate of the crew of the tug Elpida, reported on
the Yahoo website on October 23rd and in Lloyds List on October 24th. The
five Greek sailors who make up the crew are marooned on the vessel which
lies at anchor, and broken down just outside the port of Split. This
vessel has apparently been abandoned by the owners, named in the article
as Portolos Tugs and Salvage of Athens. The tug, which built in 1981, has
been at anchor since May and although there was an unsuccessful attempt to
repair the engines then, the owners have apparently been unwilling to meet
the cost of docking the tug, or towing it back to Greece.
Hence in order to comply with maritime
law the crew are obliged to remain on board, and are supported in all
respects by voluntary contributions from the people of Split mobilised by
the local ILO representative.
This is not a unique situation, and most
professional seafarers are aware of the demoralising effects of being on a
vessel lying for long periods at anchor, even under the best
circumstances. It is difficult to understand what the poor chaps on the
Elpida must be feeling. They are condemned, yet their only crime has been
to take a job on a ship, their only failing to have trusted their
employers. And when eventually they do return home will they receive any
compensation for this involuntary imprisonment? No - they will think
themselves lucky of they receive any wages.
It would be nice to think that some
latter day Samuel Plimsoll is campaigning for an improvement in this
situation, but no-one seems to be interested - except for Michael Gray. |
|
Shetland Ferry News
Gratifyingly,
we have received some comments about the piece we ran in the last News and
Views about the new ferry service to the Shetland islands. At least two
people are reading the column.
It was pointed out that the inter-island
ferries in the Shetlands are run by the Shetlands Islands Council and that
the service to the Faroes will not be filled by the St Clair, but by the
Clair, which is quite a different vessel.
Meanwhile we notice that there is a
P&O cargo ferry steaming in and out of the port which we assume is
being used to replace one of the others which is seriously broken down.
The most likely candidate is the second ferry partnering the St Rognvald.
Also at the time of writing one of the new ferries has been driven to
shelter by the high winds in the Northern North Sea. We are sure that the
passengers will be hoping there is no repeat of the time then the St Clair
was eventually forced to dock in Invergordon when Aberdeen remained closed
for ages.
|
|
The 400th UT700 Series Order
Last
month Rolls-Royce announced the 400th order for a UT700 design. It is
apparently a UT722LX which is to be built at Langsten Slip for Havila. To be
honest the UT numbering system is almost as confusing as that for the
Porsche sports car, and just when you think you've worked it out you
identify a failing in the sequence. In this case we might wonder why the
UT722 appeared after the UT745. Elsewhere
on this site there is a history of the UT704, on which the success of the
design was based, and I am told that the 100 odd ships constructed to this
design is soon to be beaten in terms of numbers by the UT755, which has
become the PSV workhorse for the world.
Probably
the other really important number is the UT705 which was originally designed
as a pipe carrier but which became the basis for all
modern PSV designs, and which specifically spawned the UT745.
|
|
|
 |
|
The Edda Fjord
The Edda Fjord has been delivered to its
owners and, since we are a bit late with this report, has arrived in
Aberdeen (7th November). Ostenjo continue to push the boundaries as they
have for almost as long as we can remember, leading the way in the
development of platform ships. This particular design is a VS498, and the
Vik-Sandvik numbers are a lot easier to understand than the Ulstein ones, so
we can tell that the ship is 98 metres long.
Initial specifications indicate that the
vessel has 17,000 bhp available and 1270m2 of deck area. We now have a
platform supply/construction vessel which has more power available than many
anchor-handlers, and I would normally ask why so much power was required for
a platform ship, and then suggest that possibly all this power was
unnecessary.
However, in the case of the Edda Fjord,
although we have no idea why it should be so powerful, we know that
the Ostenjo organisation have been amazingly accurate in their analysis of
what the oil industry might need several years after their vessels enter
service, so one of these days we will find out why the Edda Fjord is so
powerful.
|
|
Anchor-handlers and A-Frames
It
is many years since anchor-handlers habitually went about with A-frames
hanging over the stern. In the early days they were felt necessary in
order to get anchors onto the deck, but of course they prevented the ships
from towing. Now A-frames are making a come-back and both the Maersk
Assister and the Olympic Poseidon now have large frames on the stern.
Of
course these very powerful vessels are seldom used for towing and even if
they were, the sideways thrust available is sufficient to drive the ship
round onto a new heading regardless of the ability of the tow wire to move
over the quarters. On the old ships it was of course necessary for the tow
wire to be able to move over a considerable arc at the stern to allow the
ships to take up a new direction while still keeping the power on.
These
new A-frames are there to allow the vessels to be used for the deployment
of subsea equipment, and it is amazing what can be done today with a
DP system, a big crane and an ROV.
FOR INDEX OF NEWS AND VIEWS CLICK
HERE |
|