WWW.SHIPSANDOIL.COM
home   Picture of the Day     ship information   articles and features     news and views   publications   webcam 

Locations of visitors to this page

HOME
PICTURE OF THE DAY
NORTH EUROPEAN SHIPS
SOUTH ATLANTIC AND CARRIBEAN
INDIA AND INDIAN OCEAN
NORTH AMERICAN SHIPS
FAR EAST AND AUSTRALIA
MEDITERRANEAN AND MIDDLE EAST
ARTICLES AND FEATURES
NEWS AND VIEWS
PUBLICATIONS
WEBCAM

 

PREVIOUS

OCTOBER 2002 NEWSLETTER

NEXT

The Plight of the Elpida

I am beginning to feel a bit like Michael Gray, who has, against the odds, continued the champion the cause of the professional seafarer while at the same time maintaining his position as a distinguished marine commentator. After some time as editor of Lloyds List he now writes an occasional column for that paper and was previously Editor of Fairplay where he was good enough to publish my first efforts as a marine journalist back in 1986. The point here is that the marine establishment does not like to receive bad news, and people who report on the plight of seafarers are inevitably offering very bad news. The message is almost always that more money should be spent by owners, charterers and shippers to ensure that the vessels carrying their cargoes are well found , well manned and well managed. 

Of course the advantage I have is that no-one is paying me for what I write here, and no-one is likely to depose me from my position as Editor of the Marex Offshore Review, but even so one can only do a limited amount of campaigning on behalf of the mariner otherwise our readership would become distressed and stop reading altogether. We are also a magazine dealing with the offshore industry and so what is written here should in some way reflect that fact.

Having said all this I would ask our readers to reflect on the fate of the crew of the tug Elpida, reported on the Yahoo website on October 23rd and in Lloyds List on October 24th. The five Greek sailors who make up the crew are marooned on the vessel which lies at anchor, and broken down just outside the port of Split. This vessel has apparently been abandoned by the owners, named in the article as Portolos Tugs and Salvage of Athens. The tug, which built in 1981, has been at anchor since May and although there was an unsuccessful attempt to repair the engines then, the owners have apparently been unwilling to meet the cost of docking the tug, or towing it back to Greece. 

Hence in order to comply with maritime law the crew are obliged to remain on board, and are supported in all respects by voluntary contributions from the people of Split mobilised by the local ILO representative.  

This is not a unique situation, and most professional seafarers are aware of the demoralising effects of being on a vessel lying for long periods at anchor, even under the best circumstances. It is difficult to understand what the poor chaps on the Elpida must be feeling. They are condemned, yet their only crime has been to take a job on a ship, their only failing to have trusted their employers. And when eventually they do return home will they receive any compensation for this involuntary imprisonment? No - they will think themselves lucky of they receive any wages.  

It would be nice to think that some latter day Samuel Plimsoll is campaigning for an improvement in this situation, but no-one seems to be interested - except for Michael Gray. 

Shetland Ferry News

Gratifyingly, we have received some comments about the piece we ran in the last News and Views about the new ferry service to the Shetland islands. At least two people are reading the column. 

It was pointed out that the inter-island ferries in the Shetlands are run by the Shetlands Islands Council and that the service to the Faroes will not be filled by the St Clair, but by the Clair, which is quite a different vessel.

Meanwhile we notice that there is a P&O cargo ferry steaming in and out of the port which we assume is being used to replace one of the others which is seriously broken down. The most likely candidate is the second ferry partnering the St Rognvald. Also at the time of writing one of the new ferries has been driven to shelter by the high winds in the Northern North Sea. We are sure that the passengers will be hoping there is no repeat of the time then the St Clair was eventually forced to dock in Invergordon when Aberdeen remained closed for ages.

The 400th UT700 Series Order

Last month Rolls-Royce announced the 400th order for a UT700 design. It is apparently a UT722LX which is to be built at Langsten Slip for Havila. To be honest the UT numbering system is almost as confusing as that for the Porsche sports car, and just when you think you've worked it out you identify a failing in the sequence. In this case we might wonder why the UT722 appeared after the UT745.

Elsewhere on this site there is a history of the UT704, on which the success of the design was based, and I am told that the 100 odd ships constructed to this design is soon to be beaten in terms of numbers by the UT755, which has become the PSV workhorse for the world. 

Probably the other really important number is the UT705 which was originally designed as a pipe carrier but which     became the basis for all modern PSV designs, and which specifically spawned the UT745.

 

The Edda Fjord

The Edda Fjord has been delivered to its owners and, since we are a bit late with this report, has arrived in Aberdeen (7th November). Ostenjo continue to push the boundaries as they have for almost as long as we can remember, leading the way in the development of platform ships. This particular design is a VS498, and the Vik-Sandvik numbers are a lot easier to understand than the Ulstein ones, so we can tell that the ship is 98 metres long.

Initial specifications indicate that the vessel has 17,000 bhp available and 1270m2 of deck area. We now have a platform supply/construction vessel which has more power available than many anchor-handlers, and I would normally ask why so much power was required for a platform ship, and then suggest that possibly all this power was unnecessary. 

However, in the case of the Edda Fjord, although we have no idea why it should be so powerful,  we know that the Ostenjo organisation have been amazingly accurate in their analysis of what the oil industry might need several years after their vessels enter service, so one of these days we will find out why the Edda Fjord is so powerful.

Anchor-handlers and A-Frames

It is many years since anchor-handlers habitually went about with A-frames hanging over the stern. In  the early days they were felt necessary in order to get anchors onto the deck, but of course they prevented the ships from towing. Now A-frames are making a come-back and both the Maersk Assister and the Olympic Poseidon now have large frames on the stern.

Of course these very powerful vessels are seldom used for towing and even if they were, the sideways thrust available is sufficient to drive the ship round onto a new heading regardless of the ability of the tow wire to move over the quarters. On the old ships it was of course necessary for the tow wire to be able to move over a considerable arc at the stern to allow the ships to take up a new direction while still keeping the power on.

These new A-frames are there to allow the vessels to be used for the deployment of  subsea equipment, and it is amazing what can be done today with a DP system, a big crane and an ROV.   

FOR INDEX OF NEWS AND VIEWS CLICK HERE

NEWSLETTERS

December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
Feb 2008
Jan 2008
Dec 2007
Nov 2007
Oct 2007
 June 2007
 May 2007
 April 2007
 March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
June 2005
April 2005
Feb 2005
Jan 2005
Nov 2004
Oct 2004
Sept 2004
August 2004

July 2004

May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
 
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
 
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002 
July/Aug 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
July 2001
May 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000