PICTURE OF THE DAY
PIC OF THE DAY ARCHIVES
2007 - 77
2008 - 101
2009 - 124
2010 - 118
2011 - 100
- 97 Photographs
EUROPE PAGE 1
Acergy, Active, Acomarit,
Aries Offshore, Arctia, Arktik-
more, Bibby, Boa, Branding,
BUE, Boston Putford, Bourbon Offshore, Deep Sea Supply, DOF, Eide, Eidsurf,
Eidesvik, ER Schiffart
EUROPE PAGE 2
Esvagt, Fairmount, Fairplay, Farstad,
Femco, Fletcher Shipping, Fratelli d'Amato, Geoconsult, Gulf Offshore,
Harmsbergung, Harrisons, Hartmann, Havila
EUROPE PAGE 3
Heerema, Island Offshore, JP Knight, K
Line, Lauritzen Offshore, Maersk Supply, Marine Subsea, ITC, Noorhoek, Nordane,
Mokster/Eidesvik, Myklebusthaug, North Star, Nomis, O.H.Meling, Olympic
Shipping, OOC Offshore, Ostensjo Rederi, Petrobaltic, REM Offshore, Sartor
EUROPE PAGE 4
Sea Mar Shipping, Sealion, Siem Offshore,
Simon Mokster, SMS, Solstad Offshore, TFDS, Telco, Trico, Varada, Viking Supply
Astro Maritima, Bourbon Maritima, CBO,
Delba Maritima, Finarge Brasil, Gulf Brasil, GulfMark Trinidad, Norskan,
Saveiros Camuyrano, Sea Trucks Group
Garware, Greatship India, Great Offshore,
Procyon Offshore, Varun Shipping
Abdon Callais, Atlantic Towing,
Boluda, C&G Boats, Deepocean, Edison Chouest, Harvey Gulf Marine, Hornbeck, L&M
Botruc, Naviera B Tamaulipas, Oddyssea, OIL, Otto Candies, Rowan, Seacor, Sea
Nar Inc, Secunda, Tidewater.
NORTH AMERICA PAGE 2
FAR EAST & AUSTRALIA
Alam Maritim, Allied Marine,
Britoil, CH Offshore, Go Offshore, Hallin, Huawei Offshore, IOS, Jaya Holdings,
Mermaid Marine, NOR Offshore, Petra Perdana, Swire Pacific,
MED & MIDDLE EAST
Adams, Augusta, Augustea, Brodospas, EDT
Offshore, Finarge Genova, Five Oceans Salvage, Mar Sol, MCT, Med Offshore, NJSC
Chornomornaftogaz, Portosalvo, Remolques Maritimos, Seaways International,
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
NEWS AND VIEWS
THE HISTORY OF THE
SUPPLY SHIP OPERATIONS
BP SUBMIT ERRV PROPOSALS TO THE HSE
Apparently BP have submitted their proposals to
replace 17 ERRVs (Formerly SBVs - Standby Vessels) with six helicopters and some platform
based FRCs, much to the displeasure of the MPs in the all party Oil and Gas Industry
Group. They, and the Emergency Response and Rescue Vessel
Association appear to believe that submission of the proposals means that the consultation process is at an end.
Everything is going BP's way. They seem to have
all possible pressure groups is various stages of hysteria without even revealing the
details of their plan, and until they do release to all the interested parties exactly how
they intend to fulfil the performance standards relating to the recovery of personnel from
the water under a variety "foreseeable events," it will be difficult to determine
whether their plans hold water.
One assumes that they have not actually
published the details because this is one of the factors which requires consultation by
the workforce - mainly in the form of offshore safety committees. The Safety Committees
will surely be expecting to see the performance standards on paper before saying they
agree or disagree with the proposed process.
There are some who find the performance
standards being used at present just a little less than realistic.
Typically it is necessary for the rescue service
- currently the ERRV to be able to recover personnel from the water in the event of a
helicopter crash into the sea during take-off and landing.
However, it is not possible for the ERRV to
launch its fast rescue craft in adverse weather, in which case helicopters are unable to
fly and the airport in Aberdeen fills up with distressed oil workers - though not half as
distressed as the one left out on the rigs. So to extend the envelope within which the
helicopters can fly, many ERRVs are fitted with a Dacon scoop, which allows them to scoop
bodies out of the sea in a sort of vast shrimping net.
The HSE has suggested to those operating the
rigs that they should be able to test these systems to ensure that the performance
standards are fulfilled. This results in ERRVs steaming about picking up dummies in the
scoop with the sort of abandon you can afford if the target is plastic. Can these tests
really reflect how the ships can actually perform, or should other sorts of standard be
used. Could a single helicopter with a winch equal the time taken by a single ERRV in the
collection of 21 plastic bodies, because, regardless of whether the standard is
appropriate, the helicopter should be able to equal the time taken by the ship.
Or has the Operator extended the survival time for its personnel.
The General manager of BP Amoco in Aberdeen said
"Should be proceed to the next phase there will be a period of extensive offshore
trials where we will have to be able to demonstrate to ourselves and the HSE how the new
proposals can meet the company's performance standards. It is expected that this will
take until around the year end to complete."
One imagines that the interested parties will be
asking for a look at the performance standards, if for no other reason than to ensure that
there is no moving of goal posts.
SMPs INVESTIGATE BP
AMOCO SBV PLAN
On 7th August the Scottish Parliament Oil and
Gas Group visited Aberdeen to discuss the BP Amoco plan to substitute helicopters and
platform based FRCs for ERRVs (Emergency Response and Rescue Vessels) formerly known as SBVs.
There has been turmoil in the industry since BP
Amoco announced their plan and already a counter offensive has taken place orchestrated by
the ERRV Association.
The plan appears to have been promulgated by a
single announcement in the press and there-after by a video which has been circulated
round the BP Amoco Installations. Only a few non BPA people have actually seen the video
so the precise nature of the contents remains vague. However, broadly it apparently
promotes the concept of replacing the ERRVs with platform based helicopters and FRCs,
which offer, according to the video a similarly "good prospect of recovery."
Those wishing to read on, and who are not familiar with this phrase should click on the
link to Standby Vessels where there is a full explanation.
If these helicopters and FRCs do offer a good
prospect of recovery for "all foreseeable events" where offshore personnel might
end up in the water, then there is little more to be said, regardless of the views of the
offshore workforce and the offshore unions and the ERRV owners. And one should assume that
BP Amoco have theoretically distributed the hardware and skilled manpower so as to achieve the required result.
That being said, there is already a tendency for
operators to push the boundaries in terms of the performance standards for shared ERRVs,
and the practice of deploying daughter craft miles from the mother vessel is becoming more
common, to the general distress of the old time seafarers who have an instinctive distrust of small craft.
Given the legislation regarding the recovery of
personnel from the water which is in place, it is a bit difficult to see what a bunch of
MPs are going to do here, no matter how well meaning, unless they intend to pass judgement
on whether the scheme offers the aforesaid "good prospect."
This story will run and run, and we intend to
follow it on this page.
BP PLAN GAS PIPELINE CONNECTION TO MAGNUS
This is not intended to be a press release
section for Britain's premier oil company but it is turning out that way at the moment.
The company has a problem. The Magnus platform is large, and ageing and pretty remote on
the northern edge of the UK continental shelf. One of its problems is lack of gas to
provide fuel for its power systems.
BP have another problem, which is the production
of an excessive amount of gas, in terms of local requirements at its Foivaven and
Schiehallion fields out in the Atlantic. It has decided to solve both problems by
exporting gas from the latter via a pipeline which will pass through Sullom Voe in the Shetlands.
This sounds like a wonderfully innovative
solution, probably made possible by the technological developments in pipe laying, and
certainly providing additional marine work in the future
FOR INDEX OF NEWS AND VIEWS CLICK
THE HISTORY OF THE SUPPLY SHIP £37.50 INC P&P
SUPPLY SHIP OPERATIONS £27.5 INC P&P